Daily
250 words
5/10
Rating

17 July 2026

Sonam Wangchuk's hunger strike

The topic provides relevant context regarding the constitutional limits of state power, the right to protest, and the judiciary's role in balancing individual rights with public order, though it remains a specific incident rather than a landmark policy or judgment.

2 min read Day 14 of 84 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • Sonam Wangchuk is on an indefinite hunger strike at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, protesting against the current education system and demanding the resignation of the Union Education Minister.
  • The Delhi High Court has directed the Union and Delhi governments to ensure regular medical monitoring of the activist, citing that the life of a citizen is precious.
  • Medical reports indicate severe physical deterioration, including significant weight loss and potential organ stress due to prolonged fasting.
  • Supreme Court jurisprudence establishes that the state has a paternalistic duty of care to preserve the life of a person on a hunger strike while respecting their right to dissent.
  • Legal precedents, such as the 'In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident' judgment, affirm that hunger strikes are a recognized form of protest in Indian constitutional jurisprudence and are not unconstitutional.
  • The state is prohibited from disrupting peaceful protests unless there is a genuine threat to public order, communal harmony, or social tranquility.
  • The judiciary has emphasized that the state should engage in dialogue with protesters rather than adopting a hostile approach, citing historical instances of government outreach to activists.

Part of a longer story

This is day 14 of 84 in NEET-UG and National Examination Integrity Controversy, which has been running since 21 June 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the constitutional position of hunger strikes as a form of protest in India. How does the judiciary balance the individual's right to dissent with the state's duty to preserve life? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. The right to protest is a fundamental pillar of Indian democracy. Analyze the role of the state in managing civil disobedience and the extent to which the executive is obligated to engage with peaceful dissenters under the constitutional framework. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. According to Supreme Court observations in the 'In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident' case, under what circumstances can the state legally disrupt a protest?

Syllabus

Topics

Sources

250words.in · https://250words.in/daily/2026-07-17/sonam-wangchuk-s-hunger-strike