Daily
250 words
4/10
Rating

18 July 2026

Sharjeel Imam's bail plea in Delhi High Court

The topic involves the application of the UAPA and judicial procedures regarding bail, which serves as context for understanding the balance between national security laws and individual liberty under the Constitution.

1 min read Day 6 of 11 1 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • Sharjeel Imam, an accused in the 2020 north-east Delhi riots case, has challenged a trial court's rejection of his second regular bail application in the Delhi High Court.
  • The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Delhi Police, with the next hearing scheduled for August 27.
  • The accused is charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and has been in custody since August 25, 2020.
  • The trial court's rejection of the bail plea was based on a Supreme Court order dated January 5, 2026, which set specific conditions for bail consideration.
  • The Supreme Court's order mandates that bail pleas for the accused can only be renewed after the examination of protected witnesses or upon the expiry of one year from January 5, 2026, whichever is earlier.
  • The prosecution argues that there has been no substantial change in circumstances to justify a reconsideration of the bail pleas, noting the dismissal of a related review petition on April 16, 2026.

Part of a longer story

This is day 6 of 11 in Delhi riots larger conspiracy case legal proceedings, which has been running since 5 July 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the constitutional and procedural challenges associated with the grant of bail in cases involving the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). How does the judiciary balance individual liberty with the requirements of national security? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00

Prelims

  1. Under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which of the following best describes the judicial approach regarding the consideration of bail for an accused?