Daily
250 words
6/10
Rating

22 July 2026

Bail status of Khuram Parvez and Irfan Mehraj

The case involves the application and judicial interpretation of the UAPA, a critical piece of anti-terror legislation frequently examined in the context of internal security and civil liberties.

1 min read 1 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Delhi High Court declined to stay a trial court order granting bail to two individuals, Khuram Parvez and Irfan Mehraj, in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
  • The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had challenged the trial court's bail order dated 18 July.
  • The NIA argued that the case involves serious offences and contended that the trial court's bail order lacked sufficient reasoning.
  • The UAPA is the primary anti-terror legislation under which the case was registered in 2020.

Questions

  1. Discuss the balance between the state's power to invoke the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the constitutional right to personal liberty of an individual. How does the judiciary ensure that bail provisions under special statutes are not rendered illusory? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following statements regarding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) is correct?