Daily
250 words
5/10
Rating

30 July 2026

Audio feed issues in Supreme Court

The topic relates to the transparency and functioning of the judiciary, which serves as useful context for broader discussions on judicial accountability and the right to information in court proceedings.

1 min read Day 3 of 7 1 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Supreme Court of India live-streamed oral mentionings in the Chief Justice of India's court with the audio feed muted on a recent Friday.
  • The control room issued a notification stating the audio was stopped per direction in Court 1.
  • Video feed remained active, but oral exchanges between the Bench and lawyers were inaccessible to the public and media.
  • The CJI has previously characterized oral mentioning as an administrative exercise rather than a judicial proceeding.
  • Oral mentioning is a daily routine where lawyers request urgent hearings, often concerning fundamental rights, life, and liberty.

Part of a longer story

This is day 3 of 7 in Regulation of court proceeding recordings and social media circulation, which has been running since 7 July 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the significance of live-streaming court proceedings in enhancing judicial transparency and public accountability in India. What are the potential challenges in balancing open court principles with administrative efficiency? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00

Prelims

  1. In the context of the Supreme Court of India, what is the primary purpose of 'oral mentioning' as a daily court procedure?