Daily
250 words
6/10
Rating

4 August 2026

Supreme Court summons Arunachal officials over CBI probe

The case highlights the tension between executive accountability and judicial oversight, illustrating the role of the judiciary in ensuring transparency and compliance with investigative agencies like the CBI.

1 min read 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Supreme Court has summoned the Chief Secretary and Principal Secretary (Home) of Arunachal Pradesh regarding non-cooperation with a CBI investigation.
  • The CBI is conducting a preliminary inquiry into allegations of favoritism in the award of government contracts to firms linked to family members of the Chief Minister.
  • The Supreme Court previously directed the State government to produce records of contracts awarded to specific firms named in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
  • The CBI reported to the Supreme Court that the State government has failed to provide the necessary documents requested during the preliminary inquiry.
  • The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for August 24, 2026, to address the lack of compliance with its judicial directions.

Questions

  1. Discuss the role of the Supreme Court in ensuring the independence and effectiveness of central investigative agencies when dealing with state-level non-cooperation. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. Examine the constitutional and legal challenges involved in maintaining transparency and accountability in the award of government contracts, particularly in the context of federal relations between the Centre and States. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Under which jurisdiction does the Supreme Court typically issue directions to state officials to ensure compliance with its orders during an ongoing investigation?