Government stance on creamy layer in SC/ST quotas

Notes

• The Union government has formally opposed the introduction of an income-based 'creamy layer' concept for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Supreme Court.
• The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment argues that judicial precedents have established that the creamy layer principle is not applicable to SCs and STs.
• The government contends that a 'means test' is already integrated into the majority of welfare and development schemes for SCs, STs, and OBCs, ensuring benefits reach the intended beneficiaries.
• The Ministry asserts that any modification to reservation policy requires a holistic review and a thorough empirical study based on socio-economic data.
• The stated objective of reservation policy for these groups is to achieve social equality, overcome historical discrimination, and ensure inclusive participation in public life.
• The government maintains that the current debate does not raise a constitutional issue or involve the violation of fundamental rights.
• The debate gained momentum following the 2024 Supreme Court judgment in 'State of Punjab vs Davinder Singh', where a seven-judge Bench discussed the potential identification of a creamy layer for SCs and STs.
• The government clarified that the 'M. Nagaraj' case judgment only made a general observation regarding the creamy layer in the context of OBC reservations.

Part of a longer story

This is day 1 of 5 in Supreme Court ruling on creamy layer in SC/ST reservation, which has been running since 7 August 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

• Creamy layer in SC/ST reservation After
• The whole story 5 entries