Daily
250 words
7/10
Rating

14 August 2026

Bombay HC ruling on sexual history in rape trials

The topic involves a significant judicial interpretation regarding the protection of rape survivors and the application of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, which is directly relevant to judicial functioning and the legal protection of vulnerable sections.

2 min read 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • Bombay High Court ruling (August 6) highlighted the prevalence of invasive cross-examination of rape survivors regarding their sexual history.
  • Section 155(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, previously allowed evidence of a survivor's 'generally immoral character' to challenge credibility; it was repealed in 2003.
  • Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, inserted a proviso to Section 146 of the Indian Evidence Act (now Section 149 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam) to bar questions about a survivor's 'previous sexual experience' or 'general immoral character'.
  • Legal experts note that defence lawyers often circumvent these statutory bars by framing indirect questions that allude to character or sexual history.
  • Judicial precedents, such as State of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh (1996), establish that a survivor's testimony is sufficient for conviction if it inspires confidence.
  • Empirical studies (e.g., Mrinal Satish, 2017) indicate that judicial discretion and 'rape myths' regarding a 'good woman' (chastity, immediate reporting) continue to influence sentencing outcomes.
  • The Supreme Court's handbook on gender sensitivity is a key institutional reform aimed at preventing the revictimisation of survivors during court proceedings.

Questions

  1. Despite statutory bars against questioning the sexual history of rape survivors, judicial outcomes remain influenced by entrenched stereotypes. Discuss the legal provisions in place and the challenges in their implementation within the Indian justice system. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. The 'good woman' archetype often dictates the credibility of survivors in sexual assault trials, leading to systemic revictimisation. Critically examine how judicial discretion and societal biases impact the adjudication and sentencing process in rape cases. Suggest institutional reforms to ensure a gender-sensitive judicial environment. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following legal provisions currently bars questions regarding a rape survivor's 'previous sexual experience' to prove consent during cross-examination?

Syllabus

Topics

Sources

250words.in · https://250words.in/daily/2026-08-14/bombay-hc-ruling-on-sexual-history-in-rape-trials