Daily
250 words
7/10
Rating

20 August 2026

Editorial: Encroachment in Tamil Nadu tiger reserves

The topic involves a specific Supreme Court directive regarding the enforcement of the Forest Conservation Act and the Wild Life Protection Act, which serves as a significant case study for environmental governance and administrative accountability.

1 min read Day 3 of 3 2 questions 2 prelims

Notes

  • Supreme Court (SC) has directed a structured, time-bound framework for evicting encroachers from the Agasthyamalai landscape, including Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve, and Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary.
  • The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) identified significant non-forestry activities violating the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
  • Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve: 5,071.27 hectares encroached by 4,595 individuals; 116 unauthorized public utility structures identified; 118 encroachers are serving or retired government employees.
  • Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary: 427.40 hectares encroached, with 237.09 hectares under litigation.
  • Kalakad-Mudanthurai Tiger Reserve: 10.16 hectares encroached by 998 families.
  • SC directives: Initiate disciplinary action against government employees involved in encroachment; implement a moratorium on welfare schemes and infrastructure in encroached forest areas; prohibit new non-forestry activities in the landscape.
  • Challenges to eviction: Law and order concerns, rehabilitation of landless/economically weaker sections, and historical nature of encroachments.

Part of a longer story

This is day 3 of 3 in Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve eviction proceedings, which has been running since 11 August 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the challenges faced by the state in balancing the enforcement of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 with the socio-economic rehabilitation of forest-dwelling communities. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. The persistence of encroachments in ecologically sensitive tiger reserves highlights a gap in governance and judicial implementation. Analyze the role of the judiciary in ensuring the protection of forest landscapes and the necessity of a multi-departmental approach to address illegal land occupation. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following areas is part of the Agasthyamalai landscape mentioned in the context of recent Supreme Court directives regarding forest encroachments?

  2. As per the CEC report, the Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve is ecologically significant because it serves as the upper catchment of which river?

Syllabus

Topics

Sources

250words.in · https://250words.in/daily/2026-08-20/editorial-encroachment-in-tamil-nadu-tiger-reserves