Daily
250 words
6/10
Rating

21 August 2026

Delhi High Court on children's social media regulation

The topic involves a judicial directive regarding the regulation of social media for minors, which touches upon governance, policy-making powers, and the protection of vulnerable sections of society.

1 min read Day 4 of 5 1 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Delhi High Court has ruled that the regulation or banning of social media access for children is a matter of policy falling under the domain of the Central government.
  • A PIL was filed by a paediatrician and another petitioner seeking restrictions on social media for children under 13 and content regulation for those aged 13-16.
  • The petition highlighted concerns regarding the impact of addictive social media content on the emotional well-being of children.
  • Key issues raised in the petition include weak parental-consent mechanisms, the lack of robust identification systems for minors, and the prevalence of child sexual abuse material online.
  • The Delhi High Court bench, comprising Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Manmeet P. S. Arora, directed the Centre to treat the petition as a representation for policy consideration.

Part of a longer story

This is day 4 of 5 in Global legislative efforts to restrict social media access for minors, which has been running since 10 July 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the challenges associated with regulating social media access for minors in India. How does the principle of separation of powers influence the judiciary's role in addressing such policy-oriented concerns? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00

Prelims

  1. With reference to the judicial approach toward policy matters in India, which of the following best describes the stance taken by the Delhi High Court regarding the regulation of children's social media use?