Daily
250 words
7/10
Rating

26 August 2026

Allahabad HC ruling on hijab as essential religious practice

This is a significant judicial ruling concerning the interpretation of Article 25 and the 'essential religious practice' doctrine, which is a recurring theme in constitutional law and secularism debates in UPSC Mains.

1 min read 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Allahabad High Court ruled that wearing a headscarf (hijab) is not an 'essential religious practice' in Islam.
  • The ruling was delivered by a Division Bench of Justices J.J. Munir and Indrajeet Shukla on August 21.
  • The court emphasized that the absence of a headscarf does not jeopardize the faith of a Muslim woman.
  • The judiciary maintained that the dispute concerns compliance with institutional dress codes and discipline rather than an infringement on freedom of faith.
  • The court noted that no factual foundation or material was provided to prove the headscarf is an essential part of the religion.
  • The ruling aligns with previous unanimous opinions from the Bombay and Karnataka High Courts on the same issue.
  • The court held that prior practice of wearing a headscarf at a school does not create an enforceable right to compel the institution to alter its uniform policy.

Questions

  1. Examine the 'essential religious practice' doctrine as developed by the Indian judiciary in the context of balancing individual fundamental rights with institutional discipline. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. Discuss the constitutional challenges involved in reconciling the right to freedom of religion under Article 25 with the authority of educational institutions to enforce uniform dress codes. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following best describes the 'essential religious practice' test as applied by Indian courts?