Daily
250 words
4/10
Rating

30 August 2026

Bombay HC on Marathi language rule for drivers

The issue touches upon the constitutional balance between state-level linguistic requirements and the fundamental right to practice any profession, serving as useful context for discussions on federalism and regionalism.

1 min read Day 6 of 6 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Bombay High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging a Maharashtra government rule requiring auto-rickshaw, taxi, and cab drivers to possess a working knowledge of the Marathi language to obtain permits.
  • The state government informed the court that it has granted a one-year grace period for drivers to acquire the necessary proficiency in Marathi.
  • The PIL was filed by four Uber drivers who contested the legality of the language requirement for permit issuance.

Part of a longer story

This is day 6 of 6 in Maharashtra commercial vehicle licensing and language requirements, which has been running since 8 July 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the constitutional validity of state-mandated language requirements for professional licensing in the context of the freedom to practice any profession under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. Examine the balance between promoting regional linguistic identity and ensuring the fundamental right to livelihood for migrant workers in India. How does the judiciary reconcile state-level administrative requirements with the spirit of national integration? 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following best describes the recent action taken by the Bombay High Court regarding the Marathi language requirement for commercial drivers?