Daily
250 words
6/10
Rating

9 September 2026

Judicial sentencing in dowry death case

The topic highlights critical issues regarding judicial independence, the safety of judicial officers, and the application of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine in dowry death cases, which are core themes in GS2 governance and judiciary syllabus.

1 min read 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • Muzaffarnagar Additional District and Sessions Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar awarded the 23rd death sentence in five months in a dowry death case.
  • The court convicted Mohd. Nadeem for the 2018 murder of his wife, Shahzadi, categorizing it as 'rarest of rare'.
  • Conviction was secured based on the deceased's dying declaration despite prosecution witnesses turning hostile.
  • The judge highlighted concerns regarding the influence of mafia and gangsters on the judicial process in western Uttar Pradesh, including the withdrawal of criminal cases under pressure.
  • Judicial officers face significant security risks, as evidenced by historical and recent attacks on judges in India.
  • The judge emphasized the necessity of judicial independence and the duty to discharge functions without fear to maintain public confidence in the judiciary.

Questions

  1. Discuss the challenges to judicial independence in India, particularly regarding the security of judicial officers handling sensitive criminal cases. Suggest measures to strengthen the protection of the judiciary. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. The 'rarest of rare' doctrine is a crucial judicial safeguard in capital punishment cases. Analyze the evolution of this doctrine and the evidentiary challenges courts face in ensuring justice in dowry-related death cases. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Under the Indian legal framework, which of the following is the primary criterion for awarding the death penalty as established by the Supreme Court?