Daily
250 words
4/10
Rating

9 September 2026

Security review for AAP MLA Mehraj Malik

The topic serves as a contextual example of the intersection between judicial oversight, the functioning of state legislatures, and the administrative protocols for security provision in sensitive regions.

1 min read 1 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has directed the Security Review Coordination Committee to decide on a petition for security cover restoration within six weeks.
  • The petitioner, an elected legislator, sought the restoration of security and an escort vehicle following his release from detention under the Public Safety Act (PSA).
  • The PSA detention of the petitioner was previously quashed by the High Court in April.
  • The petitioner argues that security cover for public representatives should be based on an objective assessment of threat perception rather than political considerations.
  • The petition highlights the necessity of security for legislators performing duties in sensitive or terror-prone areas.

Questions

  1. Discuss the criteria and mechanisms for determining the security cover provided to elected representatives in India. How does the judiciary balance the state's discretion in security assessments with the fundamental rights of public officials to perform their constitutional duties? 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00

Prelims

  1. The Public Safety Act (PSA), often cited in the context of administrative detention in Jammu and Kashmir, is primarily a: