Supreme Court on FSSAI food warning labels

Notes

• The Supreme Court is reviewing the FSSAI's proposed two-phase rollout of front-of-pack warning labels (FoPL) for packaged foods.
• The current FSSAI proposal requires warnings for products high in two or more nutrients of concern (added fat, sugar, salt) in the first phase, extending to one nutrient in the second phase.
• The Supreme Court expressed concern that the second phase could be indefinitely postponed without a clear, scientifically justified timeline.
• The Court suggested an alternative model: prioritizing products with the highest levels of nutrients of concern, regardless of the number of nutrients involved.
• The judiciary highlighted the vulnerability of children to impulse dietary choices and recommended incorporating nutritional literacy into school curricula.
• The Court questioned the scientific basis for requiring at least two nutrients of concern for the initial warning phase.
• FSSAI has been directed to file an affidavit within 10 days addressing these concerns and providing a clear transitionary timeline.

Part of a longer story

This is day 6 of 6 in FSSAI implementation of front-of-pack warning labels, which has been running since 14 August 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

• Supreme Court on FSSAI warning labels Before
• The whole story 6 entries