Daily
250 words
8/10
Rating

26 August 2026

Judicial appointments transparency debate

The topic addresses the core constitutional debate surrounding the collegium system, judicial independence, and transparency, which are frequently examined in the context of the separation of powers and judicial accountability.

2 min read Day 7 of 10 2 questions 2 prelims

Notes

  • The collegium system for judicial appointments is a judicial creation, not explicitly provided for in the Constitution.
  • Evolution of the collegium: First Judges Case (1981) established executive primacy; Second Judges Case (1993) shifted primacy to the CJI and senior judges; Third Judges Case (1998) established the current five-member collegium.
  • Current concerns regarding the collegium include lack of vacancy notifications, absence of an eligibility matrix, and lack of transparent methodology for candidate assessment.
  • The practice of publishing resolutions with reasons, initiated in 2017, has been discontinued as of November 2025.
  • Data indicates a significant presence of familial links in the judiciary, with approximately 30% of Supreme Court judges in 2025 having familial ties to former judges.
  • The judiciary has previously held in 'Secretary, State of Karnataka vs Umadevi' (2006) that public appointments must follow transparent procedures.
  • The Supreme Court ruled in 'CPIO vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal' (2019) that the CJI's office falls under the Right to Information Act.
  • Comparative models: The UK uses a Judicial Appointments Commission with public advertisements, and South Africa utilizes public, televised interviews for judicial candidates.
  • Proposed reforms include publishing anticipated vacancies, inviting applications, disclosing objective criteria, and providing reasoned recommendations for selections.

Part of a longer story

This is day 7 of 10 in Supreme Court Collegium transparency and appointment process, which has been running since 29 June 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. The collegium system for judicial appointments has been described as a judicial innovation rather than a constitutional mandate. Discuss the evolution of this system through landmark Supreme Court judgments and the ongoing debate regarding its transparency and accountability. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. Analyze the tension between judicial independence and the constitutional requirement for transparency in public appointments. In light of the principles laid down in cases like 'Secretary, State of Karnataka vs Umadevi' and 'CPIO vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal', evaluate whether the current collegium process aligns with the constitutional values of equality and equal opportunity. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following Supreme Court cases established the current five-member collegium system for judicial appointments?

  2. In the context of judicial transparency, what was the significance of the 2019 Supreme Court judgment in 'CPIO vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal'?

Syllabus

Topics

Sources

250words.in · https://250words.in/daily/2026-08-26/judicial-appointments-transparency-debate