Daily
250 words
8/10
Rating

31 August 2026

Bihar reservation policy debate

The debate over sub-categorisation of SC/ST reservations and the creamy layer concept involves significant constitutional and social justice questions that are frequently tested in the context of welfare policies and social empowerment.

1 min read Day 4 of 5 2 questions 1 prelims

Notes

  • Debate in Bihar regarding the review and sub-categorisation of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) reservation policies.
  • Discourse involves the concept of the 'creamy layer' within reserved categories.
  • Political debate exists regarding the impact of reservation policy modifications on social equity and electoral representation.
  • Calls have been made for the potential implementation of sub-categorisation to address internal disparities within reserved groups.

Part of a longer story

This is day 4 of 5 in Supreme Court ruling on creamy layer in SC/ST reservation, which has been running since 7 August 2026. Reading it whole is usually worth more than reading today alone — the exam asks how something developed.

Questions

  1. Discuss the constitutional provisions and the rationale behind the sub-categorisation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits. 150 words
    Attempt this — 150 words in 8 min
    0 / 150 words 8:00
  2. The 'creamy layer' concept was initially applied to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Analyze the legal and social implications of extending the creamy layer principle to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the context of social justice and constitutional equality. 250 words
    Attempt this — 250 words in 11 min
    0 / 250 words 11:00

Prelims

  1. Which of the following best describes the 'creamy layer' concept in the context of Indian reservation policy?